Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 674 67% 546 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8656) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 63.7 58% 68.9 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 66.7 55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126K SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 142 143 142 143 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 504 Write 144 Mixed 206 SusWrite 142 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 74.7 4K Mixed 34.1 122% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 105 87% 131 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 79%
Intenso Sata III 256GB 2,573 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 63GB free Firmware: R0817B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 62 27 69 63 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 508 Write 438 Mixed 373 SusWrite 116 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 99.3 4K Mixed 21.4 120% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 1.2 65% 150 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB 15,450 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 29.1 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	27x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	5x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16