MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 15:10
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 812
81% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.6% Good
Lighting 82.4
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 99.3
67% 86.7 fps
MRender 78.3
Gravity 89.3
Splatting 66
63% 77.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1342 440 441 442 442 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,603
Write 2,276
Mixed 1,606
SusWrite 591
394% 1,769 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 91.2
315% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,072
795% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 284%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
71GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 310 310 310 311 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 487
Mixed 462
SusWrite 329
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 60.3
202% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
72GB free
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 433 432 431 432 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 301
Mixed 338
SusWrite 432
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 41.5
151% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 151
165% 279 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
269GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 245 125 144 176 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 469
Write 464
Mixed 418
SusWrite 221
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 35.2
117% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 215
158% 208 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
848GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 127 128 125 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 48.3
Write 91
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 125
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 34
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 28.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $703
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback