Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6770HQ 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 169 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 522 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro 580 (Mobile Skylake) 776 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Intel(8086 2064) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 14.6 13% 13.6 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 23.3 14% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 128GB-$126 5,326 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126KB Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 415 Write 108 Mixed 199 52% 241 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 23.2 83% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 152 127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905630-030.A00G 1x16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.1% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 12 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 10.8 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16