Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	720 x 576 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181030
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 14 '19 at 07:11
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130 5,094 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 292 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 794 77% 633 Pts	64-Core 811 50% 811 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6284) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2777 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 167 Reflection 163 Parallax 154 136% 161 fps	Gravity 148 Splatting 123 118% 135 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI MR9272-8i 498GB 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 272 130 177 205 212 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

LSI MR9272-8i 2TB 1TB free Firmware: 3.23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 75 54 51 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

USB DISK 2.0 8GB 5,616 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.6 4.2 3.6 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Read 18 Write 2.3 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.8 8% 7.32 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.52% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 5.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 5.6 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.52% Great: 13%
Generic Storage Device 8GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 6GB free, PID 1336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.8 4.2 5.2 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 4.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.8 8% 6.57 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.9 108% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB 463 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 25.7 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 27.1 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	44x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	37x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	42x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	6x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	49x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $995

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16