Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46% Average
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 132
47% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 373
41% 317 Pts
64-Core 370
25% 370 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 168
Parallax 23.5
7% 71.3 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 33.7
10% 25.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7201Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 525 532 528 526 522 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1055
Write 1,857
Mixed 1040
SusWrite 569
256% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 57.2
186% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 745
558% 745 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 168%
Great: 298%
Jmicron Generic 256GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 135 58 150 167 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 384
Write 238
Mixed 83
SusWrite 143
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 13.8
51% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 66.9
48% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$5
9GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.9 10 11 10 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 6.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 9
16% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback