Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 21:43
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 235
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 913
81% 685 Pts
64-Core 2,412
149% 2,412 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 85.8
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 210
70% 131 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 148
Splatting 144
110% 132 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,142
Write 1,272
Mixed 566
290% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 58.1
244% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 653
585% 885 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.6
Write 76.4
Mixed 53.8
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate ST4000VN003-1T5168 4TB
6GB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 58 72 68 68 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 76.9
Write 76
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 65.2
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 96%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
5GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 67
Write 71.2
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 68.9
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239
7GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 112 110 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
412% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 44.6
Write 77.3
Mixed 47.9
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.2
Write 102
Mixed 42.4
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$249
9GB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 110 108 100 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 108
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
321% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C14-16GVK F4-3200C14-16GVK F4-3200C14-16GTZ F4-3200C14-16GTZ 64GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
169% Outstanding
MC Read 68.5
MC Write 67.3
MC Mixed 67.2
193% 67.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 26.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback