Lenovo 27561Q8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 27561Q8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130130
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 19:58
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$84
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 181
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 344
48% 348 Pts
64-Core 350
24% 350 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.78
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 14.2
3% 12.5 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 16.3
4% 13.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 105 101 94 106 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 115
Write 115
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 104
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.4
283% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 63%
Great: 118%
ASMT 2115 750GB
391GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 85 77 77 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 77
Write 68.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 80.5
93% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 47%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$5
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 8.3 8.3 7.3 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 10.5
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 7.2
16% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 04EF Team-Elite-1600 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 10.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback