Asus X550JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 19:57
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 122
35% 226 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 178D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.38
1% 6.2 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.43
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,751
Write 4,424
Mixed 4798
1,110% 4,991 MB/s
4K Read 498
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 284
1,236% 334 MB/s
DQ Read 1,070
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 340
388% 676 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1867, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback