HP ProLiant MicroServer

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ProLiant MicroServer (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 13 '19 at 17:07
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion II Neo N40L 169 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 39.6 29% 39.7 Pts	4-Core 39.5 8-Core 39.4 5% 39.5 Pts	64-Core 37.7 2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 1222) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.53% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 1.19 1% 1.86 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.53% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 123 104 117 128 132 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.1% Poor	Read 211 Write 135 Mixed 164 SusWrite 119 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 7.9 34% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 119%
Vb0250ea VER 250GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 228GB free Firmware: HPG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 33 35 35 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 84.5 Write 15 Mixed 40 SusWrite 34.8 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 56%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 62GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 25 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 81.7 Write 25.3 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 26.4 30% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 57%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB 1,089 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 427GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 27 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 81.2 Write 24.7 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 26.9 30% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 214GB free Firmware: CR10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 30 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 41.8 Write 12.8 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 30 20% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 89 93 95 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 94 Write 102 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 93.1 115% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.5 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer

CPU
Turion II Neo N40LAMDBench 29%, 169 samples	9x
Turion II Neo N54LAMDBench 35%, 191 samples	4x
Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-CoreAMDBench 30%, 91 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	4x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TBBench 15%, 425 samples	1x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	8x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $113

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16