Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 13 '19 at 16:50
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 236 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 641 65% 525 Pts	64-Core 660 41% 660 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.7% Very good	Lighting 88.3 Reflection 90.3 Parallax 166 72% 115 fps	MRender 89.3 Gravity 111 Splatting 128 92% 109 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 718 611 641 646 609 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 2,038 Write 1,655 Mixed 631 SusWrite 736 281% 1,265 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 198 4K Mixed 63.5 255% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,118 DQ Write 1,140 DQ Mixed 816 700% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 108GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 170 157 182 185 179 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 214 Write 264 Mixed 249 SusWrite 178 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 34.4 123% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 196 160% 225 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 25GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 183 180 161 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 248 Write 264 Mixed 281 SusWrite 166 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 41.1 134% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 206 161% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 85%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 909GB free Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 106 107 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 110 Write 102 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 105 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 121 125 126 123 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 814GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 59 57 76 130 119 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 136 Write 139 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 93.5 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 145GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 77 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 81.8 Write 58 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 77.9 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 85%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 6TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 212 218 225 224 219 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
ASMT 2105 250GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 154GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 242 257 274 272 258 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 274 Write 216 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 256 259% 201 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 24.8 2,541% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.2 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 31.6 1,681% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 225%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,820 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 43.2 MC Write 44.7 MC Mixed 41.7 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 44.7 SC Mixed 35.3 101% 35.5 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)