PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140724 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 13 '19 at 08:14 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 228GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 116 51 94 2 32 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
6GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 53 53 50 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$60
318GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 133 133 135 135 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
8GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 23 23 19 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 66x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 78x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |