Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '19 at 22:09
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 138
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 247
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 119
Parallax 114
99% 118 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 84.6
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM60.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 56 48 46 30 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 424
Write 167
Mixed 157
SusWrite 48
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 11.4
22% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 82.9
DQ Write 97.3
DQ Mixed 21.8
35% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 1TB
104GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 37 37 37 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 37
Write 37
Mixed 27
SusWrite 36.1
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
810GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 40.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 40.8
54% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.3% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 20
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 6.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback