Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 12 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600K-$137
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56% Above average
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 173
64% 134 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 336
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 331
22% 331 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$340
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 198
Reflection 162
Parallax 254
52% 205 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 176
Splatting 183
49% 163 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 50%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc24 0G1CS1754D117-82 240GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 148 95 84 99 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 316
Write 129
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 108
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 22.8
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 16.5
35% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$70
556GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 41.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 92.4
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 13 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 9.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 11.8
7% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 98%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 139 139 139 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 89.9
Mixed 75
SusWrite 139
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$90
194GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 62 65 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 75.1
Mixed 30
SusWrite 63.6
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 250GB
96GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 59 54 50 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 146
Write 35.9
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 53.1
83% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
105% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 1,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $741
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback