Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 194 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 371 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 3.25 4% 4.11 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 60GB 2,582 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 75 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	59% Above average	Read 368 Write 75.8 Mixed 113 SusWrite 72.4 34% 157 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 29.9 118% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 64.5 DQ Mixed 76.7 59% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-085.A00LF 1x4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	7x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	4x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	5x
545s Series 512GBIntel $95Bench 107%, 12,034 samples	4x
WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TBWDCBench 28%, 3,395 samples	4x

RAM
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 58%, 239 samples	6x
TS128MLK72V3U 4x1GBTranscendBench 49%, 6 samples	5x
HMT351U7BFR8A-H9 Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 16GBHynixBench 48%, 4 samples	4x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $135

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16