Asrock H97 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 10:32
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$248
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56% Above average
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 177
64% 135 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 372
43% 329 Pts
64-Core 421
28% 421 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 72.7
15% 61.5 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 49.7
15% 46.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 347 303 154 22 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 592
Write 446
Mixed 445
SusWrite 212
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 44.9
161% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 295
230% 310 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 101%
Great: 154%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$69
58GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 11 16 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Read 15
Write 15.7
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 13.3
12% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 67%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
32GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 95 97 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 108
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 95.5
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 105%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
185GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 109 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 114
Write 73
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 109
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 36 36 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H97 Killer Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Killer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $787
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $202AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $329Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback