Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 153% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 140% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180917
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 10 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 148 2-Core 262 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 1,010 98% 803 Pts	64-Core 1,049 65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	156% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 232 Parallax 218 176% 222 fps	MRender 259 Gravity 206 Splatting 136 157% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 272GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 453 479 476 466 472 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 466 Mixed 298 SusWrite 462 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 42.8 156% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 278 229% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 74.2 Write 25.8 Mixed 27 SusWrite 27.9 28% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FD 2x8GB 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 13.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	475x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	347x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	266x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	150x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	113x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	47x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16