| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160316 |
| Uptime | 6 Days |
| Run Date | May 10 '19 at 20:39 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 74% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.4%
Very good
|
74% 127 Pts
|
48% 357 Pts
|
24% 383 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
25% 34.6 fps
|
38% 45.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 18 17 29 15 25 MB/s
|
21%
Poor
|
22% 97.2 MB/s
|
36% 12 MB/s
|
12% 15.7 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
21GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 143 130 129 138 140 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
73% 101 MB/s
|
83% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
40GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 31 27 34 30 32 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
115% 91.1 MB/s
|
217% 3.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
70%
Good
|
71% 25 GB/s
|
57% 20 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,302 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 589x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 459x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 459x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 557x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 394x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 240x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $425 |