Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DA7/E (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DA7/E
Memory	54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 10 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 176 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 604 55% 460 Pts	64-Core 1,604 99% 1,604 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.7% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 40 Parallax 53.2 30% 43.5 fps	MRender 48 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 28 31% 39.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 1TB-$700 1,628 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 835GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 420 412 417 410 409 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 385 Write 420 Mixed 296 SusWrite 414 86% 379 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 35.2 121% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 232 193% 277 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 109%
Crucial M550 1TB-$700 1,628 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3GB free Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 424 Write 430 Mixed 291 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 36.1 124% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 231 208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 13GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 78 78 76 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 76.3 Write 52 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 76.6 50% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 199GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 10.6 15% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 39GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 49.5 Write 54.8 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 56.9 64% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 270GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.1 9.9 10 9.9 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 23.7 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 9.8 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 61%
Sony DSC 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 42GB free, PID 07c8 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 5.9 5.9 6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.9% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 10.3 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 5.9 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.2 148% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 11%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB 2,661 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 158GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.9 10 9.9 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 23.3 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 9.9 27% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.7 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	3x

GPU
NVS 510NvidiaBench 3%, 2,450 samples	3x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x

SSD
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	2x
850 Pro 128GBSamsung $70Bench 99%, 18,195 samples	2x
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x

RAM
9965516-165.A 8x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 3 samples	3x
M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 183 samples	2x
18JSF1G72PDZ- 4x8GBMicronBench 86%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16