Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.6% Average
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 119
44% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 311
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 302
20% 302 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$148
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 115
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 116
30% 102 fps
MRender 79.7
Gravity 110
Splatting 79.3
29% 89.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 143 357 365 361 359 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 10.3
Write 10
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 274
18% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 117%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
725GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 69 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 73
Write 74.8
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 71.2
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
229GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 160 166 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 150
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 166
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 50 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 48.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 54.3
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 5,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $706
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback