| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3067-A1 |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150618 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 10 '19 at 17:49 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
74.9%
Very good
|
71% 119 Pts
|
47% 378 Pts
|
28% 456 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
AMD(1002 2B06) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.3.3.0
|
7.36%
Terrible
|
8% 8.5 fps
|
7% 8.49 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 76 74 74 73 73 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
69% 309 MB/s
|
112% 37.9 MB/s
|
85% 176 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
179GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 104 105 105 MB/s
|
58.5%
Above average
|
67% 91.7 MB/s
|
150% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
50.4%
Above average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
63% 63.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W510 Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples | 12x |
| Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 11x |
| Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 9x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 7x |
| Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $581 |