Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 76.9 1-Core 57.3 2-Core 148 55% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 227 24% 191 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 5049) 1GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 6.66 6% 7.96 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 6.37 Splatting 13.7 7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GB 1,857 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT03L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 38 41 42 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 354 Write 45.5 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 41.4 28% 132 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 16.5 58% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 87.8 DQ Write 20.3 DQ Mixed 17.7 22% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 64%
Patriot Memory 124GB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 115GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 6.5 3 4.7 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.74% Terrible	Read 37.3 Write 0.5 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 7.9 10% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 16% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.74% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16