Asus P5QL-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5QL-E  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081201
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 18:02
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 75.2
41% 61.3 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 135
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.50
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 61 59 59 44 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 228
Write 225
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 52.4
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 23.7
80% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 32.6
32% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MK5056GSY 500GB-$106
161GB free
Firmware: LH003C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 64 58 45 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 88.1
Write 78.9
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 54.8
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 57%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
337GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 99 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 98.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 65%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
29GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 18.6
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 16.4
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.6
245% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 14 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 16.2
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 14.3
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
120% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $307
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback