Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	May 09 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 85 1-Core 104 2-Core 201 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 507 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 510 512 509 511 510 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Toshiba THNSN81Q92CSE 2TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1.5TB free Firmware: 8EET6101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 449 448 447 448 449 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 350 Write 442 Mixed 375 SusWrite 444 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 33.4 112% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 307 242% 335 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 110%
MK0200GCTYV 200GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 181GB free Firmware: 5DV1HPG4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 271 271 270 270 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 297 Write 320 Mixed 272 SusWrite 271 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 28.3 96% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 213 160% 213 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 80 83 84 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 77.8 Write 78.5 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 82.5 58% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 67%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 38 37 40 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 219 Write 20.6 Mixed 38 SusWrite 36.6 74% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	87x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	26x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	8x
SNV2S2000G 2TBKingstonBench 280%, 16,715 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $386

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16