Toshiba Satellite M645

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite M645  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NBQAA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 17:07
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22% Poor
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 79.1
26% 56.8 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 123
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD80) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2119
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 3.9
1% 3.67 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.8
1% 2.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9SA00 160GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
ADATA HV620S 1TB
878GB free, PID a64a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 22
Mixed 21
SusWrite 17.1
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 3.5 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Read 16
Write 4.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.4
8% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 2.5 3.6 3.6 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Read 19
Write 16.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.3
13% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite M645 Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite M645

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback