Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 15:55
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 120
52% 85 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 281
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 50.5
Parallax 59.5
41% 53.4 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 36.2
35% 44.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 167 158 64 56 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 480
Write 443
Mixed 375
SusWrite 126
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 44
148% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 180
155% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
235GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 84
Write 61.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 39.2
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
376GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 125 125 126 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 148
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 126
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
376GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 45 45 44 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 46
Write 40.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 44.3
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback