Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-6300-$60
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.6% Average
SC Int 58.3
SC Float 60.5
SC Mixed 65.9
49% 61.6 Pts
QC Int 205
QC Float 218
QC Mixed 224
49% 216 Pts
MC Int 161
MC Float 202
MC Mixed 308
33% 224 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$246
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49% Average
Lighting 151
Reflection 131
Parallax 190
51% 158 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 136
Splatting 83.6
48% 109 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49%
Great: 53%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$130
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 60 61 61 54 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 472
Write 441
Mixed 360
SusWrite 85.4
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 44.8
149% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 179
154% 228 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82%
Great: 117%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$66
235GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 38 38 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 64.7
Mixed 48
SusWrite 39.8
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 59%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$110
376GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 126 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 147
Mixed 72
SusWrite 126
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$121
376GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 46.2
Write 46
Mixed 39
SusWrite 44.2
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $533
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $84
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $140Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $213Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $274Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback