HP 810-160

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 810-160  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 11:32
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 502
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 462 467 469 463 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 456
Mixed 384
SusWrite 466
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 40.1
136% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 105 108 115 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 101
Write 95.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 101
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58%
Great: 112%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
239GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 16 18 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 32
Write 19.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 16.8
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 2.3
284% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
239GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 16 16 16 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 23
SusWrite 17.1
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 4.2
369% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
239GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 17 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 32.7
Write 22
Mixed 24
SusWrite 16.3
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 2.1
287% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 126%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
239GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 21.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 16.3
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 2.2
300% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-160 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback