PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R940power (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3358-A1 |
Memory | 99.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170120 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | May 08 '19 at 08:10 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
47.8%
Average
|
||||
59%
Above average
|
||||
63%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples | 1x |
Xeon E5-2643 v3IntelBench 78%, 279 samples | 1x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 1x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 1x |
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |