Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13M (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA VG10S
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '19 at 18:53
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 148 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 391 41% 327 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA47) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 6.62 3% 6.26 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.83 5% 5.45 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 419 390 420 422 414 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 416 Write 373 Mixed 345 SusWrite 409 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 25.2 117% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 49.1 99% 196 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 246GB free Firmware: AM003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 48 48 50 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 74.8 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 47.3 33% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 60%
USB FLASH DRIVE 1GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Read 16.4 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3.8 7% 7.05 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 9%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB 5,016 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.57% Terrible	Read 10 Write 4 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.7 8% 6.12 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.57% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-427.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 12GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13M

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)