Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	8.39% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5300-$40 310 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U23, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 23 1-Core 18.5 2-Core 25.1 15% 22.2 Pts	4-Core 32.6 8-Core 34.4 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 38.7 2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10FB) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.561.0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.31 0% 0.24 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 010G SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 40 29 26 52 50 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.39% Terrible	Read 69.3 Write 47.8 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 41.8 12% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 11% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 65%
DISK 4GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.7 2.9 2.8 3.2 3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Read 9 Write 3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 2.9 5% 4.22 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.1% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.5 6% 2.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.5 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16