Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '16 at 21:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 214
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 682
65% 540 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.134.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 41.2
29% 35.9 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 36.4
26% 31.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 168
Write 84.3
Mixed 103
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 10.8
73% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 71.6
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 7.25
26% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
679GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 115
Write 101
Mixed 110
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.44
100% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
222GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 97
Write 92.8
Mixed 91.2
70% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.72
125% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback