Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	53 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190309
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 06 '19 at 16:30
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 69 1-Core 117 2-Core 227 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 901 80% 676 Pts	64-Core 1,776 110% 1,776 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Asus(1043 04C4) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.5% Very good	Lighting 82.4 Reflection 89.3 Parallax 177 67% 116 fps	MRender 89.8 Gravity 131 Splatting 130 98% 117 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 179 177 237 67 188 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 485 Write 18.8 Mixed 359 SusWrite 172 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 45.5 122% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 259 186% 236 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 872GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1073 898 953 1539 510 1125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 639 Write 1,448 Mixed 1,825 SusWrite 1,016 282% 1,232 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 42.2 163% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 452 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 442 321% 417 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 410%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 21 30 16 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 57.2 Write 6.7 Mixed 21 SusWrite 24 20% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB 3,127 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	MC Read 65.3 MC Write 63.4 MC Mixed 63.6 183% 64.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 24.8 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 130%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	16x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16