HP EliteBook 8460p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP EliteBook 8460p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110929
Uptime25.9 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 13:42
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.3% Average
1-Core 79
2-Core 127
50% 103 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 190
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 194
13% 194 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6470M
HP(103C 161E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.6
2% 7.87 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 6.1
2% 5.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0510B
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 496
Write 400
Mixed 134
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 12.3
95% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 18.9
66% 143 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteBook 8460p Builds (Compare 3,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 8460p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $234
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback