PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Samsung R580/R590 (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG R580/R590 |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100622 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 06 '19 at 08:27 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.83%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 109 68 66 66 64 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
57GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 53 54 54 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
430GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 20 20 21 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
4GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
9.72%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples | 42x |
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples | 29x |
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $52 |