Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 51.2 2-Core 99.4 39% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 197 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E39 A003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 2.22 2% 2.51 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 6.04 4% 4.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 137GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 36 34 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 32.6 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 36.2 43% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB 783 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 11.3 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16