PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101110 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 05 '19 at 13:23 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.1
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 324 345 345 350 348 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
403GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 178 182 182 178 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
847GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
441GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 41x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 33x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 12x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $222 |