PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | May 04 '19 at 18:16 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 328B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 55 50 44 47 55 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
549GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 126 127 130 MB/s
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
65GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 63 63 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book 1234 2TB
123GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 118 118 120 121 MB/s
|
51%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 508x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 325x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |