Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7100-$99 1,343 User benchmarks, average bench 33% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 41 30% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 40.3 8-Core 40.6 5% 40.4 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 9005) 384MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.19 Gravity 0.07 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.2% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$54 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 113 73 69 54 55 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20% Very poor	Read 171 Write 126 Mixed 115 SusWrite 83.3 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 11 24% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 6 0.1 7.7 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 30 Write 17.4 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 8.6 22% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16