PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180208 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | May 04 '19 at 10:41 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PM830 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 47 35 23 16 24 MB/s
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung PM830 128GB
36GB free
Firmware: 2D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 149 183 168 166 144 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
253GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 106 104 104 106 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix-00AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 96x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 82x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 62x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 51x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |