PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 7910 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 7910 (all builds) |
Memory | 25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20181213 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | May 04 '19 at 02:18 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FirePro W5100 Graphics Adapter
Dell(1028 230C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 1TB
546GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 399 398 395 423 412 MB/s
|
87.7%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.7 16 17 17 16 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB
124GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 20 20 21 21 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.6%
Very good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 60x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 57x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 102x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 70x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |