Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 11,837 User benchmarks, average bench 42% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 140 55% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 231 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 17.9 15% 16.9 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 20 15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 14 3.4 17 104 253 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 401 Write 49.1 Mixed 194 SusWrite 99.9 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 16.4 63% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 79.8 DQ Mixed 18.8 35% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD44G240082 2x4GB 2,047 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.3% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 14.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 10.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16