CMS 7200-5409/A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCMS 7200-5409/A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 20:37
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 301
101% 183 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 974
97% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 188
Parallax 186
144% 184 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 171
Splatting 122
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 204 187 196 194 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,039
Write 282
Mixed 352
SusWrite 200
102% 468 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58.9
205% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 312
309% 496 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 143%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 118 117 115 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 124
Write 98.7
Mixed 71
SusWrite 117
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 84%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 42
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 41.2
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 180 178 181 180 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 164
Mixed 104
SusWrite 179
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
436% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 40 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 38
Write 40.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 40.1
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.4
179% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 66%
Lexar CF USB_3_0 Read 64GB
48GB free, PID b050
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 75 74 74 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 122
Write 50.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 74.8
82% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
118% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 52%
Samsung M3 Portable 1.5TB
3GB free, PID 61b4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 33 31 31 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 54
Write 28
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 35.7
48% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback