PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120131 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 02 '19 at 16:45 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 59% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1008 MHz, MLim: 1204 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 72 56 64 70 65 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
88GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 109 108 110 110 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
67GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 82 83 82 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 40x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $370 |