Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 241
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 954
85% 718 Pts
64-Core 2,260
140% 2,260 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 163
Parallax 225
145% 189 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 195
Splatting 139
150% 190 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 138%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4678
Write 53.3
Mixed 107
335% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 710
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 6.6
1,086% 240 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
931GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 415
Mixed 372
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 47.4
162% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
894GB free
Firmware: MU01.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 352
Mixed 348
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 36.4
128% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 233
196% 282 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 95%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82
905GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,944
Write 1,404
Mixed 1,075
326% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 70.8
261% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 1,178
DQ Mixed 445
479% 781 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 31.4
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 9.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 97%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,631
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback