Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$424
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 243
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 706
70% 555 Pts
64-Core 919
62% 919 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 111
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 127
29% 105 fps
MRender 79.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 80.2
30% 90.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 608 606 606 604 601 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,418
Write 1,124
Mixed 580
SusWrite 625
209% 937 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 40.1
163% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 831
649% 896 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 186%
Great: 259%
Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM164 1TB
570GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 103 102 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 102
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AARS-003BB1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 87
Write 85.8
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 89.7
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 14.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 8.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 3,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,372
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback