Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7800X-$370
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
SC Int 112
SC Float 118
SC Mixed 110
91% 113 Pts
QC Int 458
QC Float 447
QC Mixed 404
99% 436 Pts
MC Int 854
MC Float 974
MC Mixed 919
137% 916 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 113%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 111
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 127
36% 105 fps
MRender 79.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 80.2
39% 90.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$130
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 608 606 606 604 601 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,418
Write 1,124
Mixed 580
SusWrite 625
209% 937 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 40.1
163% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 831
649% 896 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 186%
Great: 263%
Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM164 1TB
570GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 103 102 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 102
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AARS-003BB1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 87
Write 85.8
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 89.7
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 14.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 8.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $1,208
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $709Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $606SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback