| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Studio XPS 1640 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0Y536R |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110409 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 01 '19 at 17:03 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40.4%
Average
|
36% 51.3 Pts
|
9% 67.9 Pts
|
4% 72.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Dell(1028 0272) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
|
3%
Terrible
|
3% 3.48 fps
|
3% 3.94 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 165 164 170 167 168 MB/s
|
45%
Average
|
38% 168 MB/s
|
71% 26 MB/s
|
82% 106 MB/s
|
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
886GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 20 20 19 20 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
27% 20.4 MB/s
|
90% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
16% 5.77 GB/s
|
13% 4.67 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 1640 Builds (Compare 48 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 1640
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 12x |
| Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobility Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 2,160 samples | 25x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 3670ATIBench 2%, 405 samples | 22x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4600ATIBench 4%, 1 sample | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 36% - Below average | Total price: $80 |