Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5M/300E5L (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5M-XD1BR
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 01 '19 at 16:30
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 176 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 273 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C784) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Lighting 6.83 Reflection 8.35 Parallax 6.47 6% 7.22 fps	MRender 6.76 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 0.09 3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 38 56 53 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 327 Write 150 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 45.8 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 8.3 26% 8.63 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 85 DQ Mixed 41.1 47% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GB 2,421 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	189x
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples	102x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	95x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	218x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	104x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	22x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	8x

RAM
SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,421 samples	142x
SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 35%, 1,004 samples	80x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16