Asus A58M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus A58M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 12:50
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.2% Below average
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 127
46% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 212
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 210
14% 210 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$135
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 140
Reflection 134
Parallax 193
37% 155 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 126
Splatting 83.6
36% 106 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 34 65 63 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 251
Write 75.8
Mixed 95
SusWrite 53.9
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 33.3
19% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$17
85GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 114
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
132GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 123 126 128 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 35
SusWrite 124
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 15.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A58M-E Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A58M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback