User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 05:50
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 97.2
50% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 367
31% 266 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(1B0A 90BD) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 5.75
6% 6.43 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 5.43
4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 47 56 62 55 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 75.9
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 52.2
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback