Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 148%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
12 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 18:58
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$355
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
107% 227 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1012
102% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,236
83% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$240
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 229
Reflection 204
Parallax 218
60% 217 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 210
Splatting 163
58% 174 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 298 278 266 251 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,991
Write 1,419
Mixed 614
SusWrite 319
240% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 54.3
233% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 640
587% 900 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 215%
Great: 234%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
315GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1560 1519 1499 1505 1600 1530 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,110
Write 1,512
Mixed 767
SusWrite 1,536
330% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 72.8
262% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1032
811% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 311%
Great: 356%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$300
384GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 455 470 430 430 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 452
Mixed 351
SusWrite 449
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 49
176% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 192
188% 299 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$44
724GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 97 100 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 65
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 100
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$69
568GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 50 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 99.3
Write 100
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 50.5
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 27.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 28.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 9,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,551
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback